Presented at the 2017 meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, the 2017 meeting of the European Political Science Association, and the 2017 meeting of the American Political Science Association.
How does electoral manipulation affect elected officials' incentives to satisfy their constituents? The literature has highlighted the role of elections as a way to keep politicians accountable to the voters. Yet, we know little about how electoral processes whose integrity has been compromised affect public officials' actions while in office. This paper presents a formal model of electoral accountability in which electoral manipulation can occur during the campaign. Three findings are derived from the model: i) rent extraction increases with levels of electoral manipulation, ii) the value of holding public office is positively related to rent extraction for high values of office, and iii) electoral manipulation increases with the value of office. Using a fuzzy regression discontinuity design that exploits rules determining the sizes of polling stations in Colombia, we find a positive effect of vote buying during mayors' elections on the likelihood of the election winner being sanctioned for violating laws governing public officials. Consistent with our theory, the data show that higher values of office are not linked to less sanctions, but are associated with more reports of vote buying.pdf. supplemental material.
Presented at the 2016 meeting of the American Political Science Association and the 2016 meeting of the European Political Science Association.
How do parties protect themselves from electoral manipulation? To answer this question, we study the drivers of polling station party representatives' presence and their impact on electoral outcomes in an environment where electoral irregularities are common. Using election data from the Mexican Chamber of Deputies, we find a robust positive correlation between the presence of party representatives and that party's vote share. The evidence suggests that this correlation can be attributed to party representatives influencing the electoral results. We also formulate a game theoretic model of the levels of representation chosen by parties in a given precinct and structurally estimate its parameters. We find that parties send their representatives where they expect their opponents to send their own. The finding suggests representatives play a primarily protective role, even when they are often involved in irregularities themselves.pdf. supplemental material.
Presented at the 2011 meeting of the American Political Science Association and the 2010 meeting of the Society for Political Methodology.
The effect of conditioning on an additional covariate on confounding bias depends, in part, on covariates that are unobserved. We characterize the conditions under which the interaction between a covariate that is available for conditioning and one that is not can affect bias. When the confounding effects of two covariates, one of which is observed, are countervailing (in opposite directions), conditioning on the observed covariate can increase bias. We demonstrate this possibility analytically, and then show that these conditions are not rare in actual data. We also consider whether balance tests or sensitivity analysis can be used to justify the inclusion of an additional covariate. Our results indicate that neither provide protection against overadjustment. pdf.
Presented at the 2013 meeting of the American Political Science Association and the 2014 meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
I study civilians' cooperation with an armed group in an irregular war. In the model, civilians differ in their valuation of siding with the armed group and make cooperation decisions without knowing others' motivations or cooperation choices. I find that a superior military force is not sufficient to bring high cooperation and that full cooperation can only be attained if military power is complemented by expectations of punishment for helping the enemy. The model challenges the idea that random violence aimed at punishing enemy cooperators is used when selectivity is difficult to implement, and it shows that indiscriminate reprisals induce lower levels of cooperation, even when enemy cooperators are less likely to be punished with selective methods. Finally, I find that communities that have a highly centralized process of decision making are expected to give their support to only one group of combatants and to be exposed to less violence. pdf.
Presented at the 2013 meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association and the 2013 meeting of the Southern Political Science Association.
Vote buying is widespread in developing democracies despite the secret ballot. What explains its resilience? I argue that brokers condition future payments on published electoral results to enforce these transactions and that this is effective at inducing voters' compliance only when the results of small voting groups are available. Using monitors' and citizens' reports of electoral manipulation and survey data from Colombia, I find a robust negative correlation between the size of the average polling station and various measures of vote buying. Evidence from a variety of identification strategies suggests that this relationship can be attributed to aggregate monitoring sustaining these transactions and not to the brokers' increased ability to identify compliers or other characteristics of places where polling stations are small. pdf. supplemental material.
Presented at the 2012 meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
How do politicians buy votes in secret ballot elections? I present a model of vote buying in which a broker sustains bribed voters' compliance by conditioning future bribes on whether her candidate's votes reach an optimally-set threshold. Unlike previous explanations of compliance, the threshold mechanism does not require brokers to observe individual voters' political preferences or even vote totals of the bribed voters. I show that when there is uncertainty about voters' preferences, compliance can be sustained as long as electoral results of small groups are available. If preferences are observed however, vote buying is not deterred by higher aggregation of electoral results. I also find that vote buying is facilitated when voters care about the welfare of other voters. Using survey data from Nigeria, I provide evidence consistent with the model's results. pdf.
Presented at the 2012 meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
We develop a Maximum a Posteriori Expectation-Maximization (MAP-EM) algorithm to recover national electoral thresholds of representation and of electoral disproportionality from observed seats/votes data. We apply the procedure to 118 electoral systems used in 417 elections to the lower house across 36 European countries since WWII. We find that over half of these systems exhibit a statistically significant positive national threshold of representation. Furthermore, the two modal electoral system configurations involve positive thresholds with allocation for parties exceeding thresholds that does not statistically differ from perfectly proportional allocation (38.14% of all systems); and disproportional seat allocations with (statistically) negligible thresholds of representation (31.36% of all systems). We also develop procedures to evaluate model fit and to test for changes in electoral institutions. pdf.
Presented at the 2015 meeting of the American Political Science Association.
This paper documents a robust positive correlation between community group participation and occurrences of vote buying attempts in Latin America. Instrumental variable estimates and results of panel data models that account for time-invariant unobserved voter characteristics indicate that a more vibrant associational life facilitates this widespread form of electoral manipulation. Contrary to the expectations derived from the traditional literature on social capital, the findings show that institutions of civic participation can potentially be exploited to increase the efficiency of electoral strategies of manipulation, reducing accountability and affecting the quality of democratic processes. pdf.
Post-instrument covariates are often included in IV analyses to address a violation of the exclusion restriction. We demonstrate that even in linear constant-effects models with large samples: 1) such conditioning turns a(n) (natural) experimental study into an observational study, 2) invariance between IV estimates (with and without post-instrument covariates) does not imply that the exclusion restriction holds, 3) OLS with an omitted variable will often have less bias, 4) measurement error in the post-instrument covariate does not necessarily attenuate the effect, and 5) the bias of OLS and IV are related. Therefore, if used, IV with a post-instrument covariate should always be paired with OLS, and results should be discussed in concert. We illustrate these points with a re-analysis of Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001), showing that for the paper's claims to be valid, at least 35% of the variance in the causal variable must be due to measurement error. pdf.
How do campaign contribution limits alter the influence of donors over elected officials? We propose a model to explore this question and test its implications using data from Colombian municipalities. Using a regression discontinuity design that exploits institutional rules determining contribution limits based on population thresholds, we find that looser campaign limits reduce the number of donors per candidate and increase the average donations received by the winner of the election. Moreover, we document that donors who contributed to the winner of the election are more likely to receive contracts from the supported candidate upon taking office. These patterns suggest that looser campaign limits increase the influence of fewer individuals in campaigns. A higher influence of donors over elected officials is reflected by the fact that looser limits are associated with more kickbacks for each donor, which are awarded in a more discretionary way.
Presented at the 2018 meeting of the Peace Science Society.
Violence against civilians in civil war is widely thought of as a strategic choice by combatant groups. We argue that a common strategic logic of competition underlies diverse theories of civilian victimization. Drawing on this logic, we develop a theory of competitive outbidding in victimization, hypothesizing that an armed group's propensity to victimize civilians will increase with its expectation that its competitors will act likewise. We test this argument by structurally estimating a model of strategic interdependence between armed groups using data from the Colombian civil war. Our findings indicate that competitive outbidding is responsible for a substantial amount of violence against civilians. We estimate that each of the two major combatant groups would have carried out systematic anti-civilian violence in 12--16\% fewer municipalities if the group had expected no violence by its rival. Examining causal mechanisms, we also find that victimization in the Colombian case was more likely aimed at inducing civilian cooperation than at influencing postwar negotiating positions. pdf.
Information about the funding of campaigns during an election is just as important as the candidates’ election platforms. If money from special interests funds a campaign, voters could use information on these donations to assess whether their candidates will be representing their interests or their donors’ if elected (Ashworth 2006 and Coate 2004). Voters should know how much money is donated to a campaign, how concentrated are these donations, whether the donors were contractors of the state, and whether they have a history of receiving contracts from those who received their donations in the past. We provide this information for the current -first round- presidential campaign in Colombia 2018. We find that donors who have experience contracting with the public sector give larger contributions.pdf.